A New Classification of Necrophilia

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.
What is a necrophile exactly? What sort of interaction with death is necessary in order for one to take on that label of deviance? The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which provides the criteria by means of which most mental disorders and sexual perversions (are they the same?) are diagnosed, lumps necrophilia together with other “uncommon paraphilias.” Various attempts to classify necrophilia and its subtypes have mostly resulted in confusion — for example, as to the exact meaning of the term pseudonecrophilia. Now a paper in the August 2009 issue of the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine attempts to establish a logical classification of the varieties of necrophilia “based on severity of psychosexual disorder.”
Here are the categories proposed by Dr Anil Aggrawal, a well-known professor of forensic medicine in India:
Class I — Role Players — “They do not have sex with a dead body, but get intense arousal from having sex with a living person pretending to be dead.”
Class II — Romantic Necrophiles — “These are the normal bereaved people, who cannot bear separation from their loved ones.”
Class III — Necrophilic Fantasizers — This type is “content simply with fantasizing sexual intercourse with the dead.”
Class IV — Tactile Necrophiles — These necros “need to touch a dead body in some erotic way in order to get an orgasm.”
Class V — Fetishistic Necrophiles — This type “would cut up some portion of the body — perhaps a breast — for later fetishistic activities.”
Class VI — Necromutilomaniacs — For this category of necrophile, “pleasure comes from mutilating the dead body and masturbating simultaneously.” Evidently fetishistic necrophiles fixate on the result of an act of mutilation, whereas simultaneously enjoy the process of mutilation itself.
Class VII — Opportunistic Necrophiles — These necrophiles are basically scavengers. “Normally they are quite content having intercourse with the living and would not think of engaging in sexual intercourse with the dead. However if an opportunity arose, they would.”
Class VII — Regular Necrophiles — “They would not enjoy sexual intercourse with the living, even if this choice were available to them. Instead they would seek out a dead body to have sexual intercourse with, because they get more pleasure in having sex with a dead body.”
Class IX — Homicidal Necrophiles — These necros have such a dire need for cadavers “that they resort to killing.”
Class X — Exclusive Necrophiles — “These offenders need only dead bodies for intercourse.”
Certainly experts in sexual pathology will debate the merits of these classifications and point out some of the underlying judgements inherent in them. For example, Dr Aggrawal begins his paper with the assertion that necrophilia is “one of the most weird, bizarre and revolting practices of abnormal and perverse sensuality.” Is that a diagnostic criterion or a moral judgement? By and large, however, this classification is a reasonable effort. There is a clear difference between the couple who engages in role play, the mortician who gropes a boob, and the killer who assaults the cadaver of his victim. It is only right and proper to recognize that these constitute different forms or perhaps intensities of necrophilia.
Taking a broader view of the matter, it is difficult not to remark that necrophilia has become increasingly visible in society. It used to be that necrophilia was a subject reserved for obscure medical journals and the occasional novel. Before the advent of the internet, PervScan had gathered a small collection of necrophilia cases from medical journals, scholarly works of psychiatry such as Erich Fromm’s Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, and counter-culture publications such as Adam Parfrey’s Apocalypse Culture. Material was difficult to find. Nowadays the situation is the opposite. Necrophilia is on tv. Necrophilia is on the internet. Necrophilia is the subject of one of Supervert’s own books. Necrophilia is, in short, coming out of the closet.
Dr Aggrawal’s effort to classify the varieties of necrophilia is one expression of this. There is now enough freely available case material to create a taxonomy of necrophiles. Another expression of the increasing visibility of necrophilia lies in the fact that states are only recently starting to outlaw it. Previously it was too obscure or hidden even to warrant legislation. Taken together, all these point to a process comparable to the “invention” of homosexuality in the 19th century. People have always had same-sex relationships, but it was only a century or so ago that homosexuality became a term, an existential category, a medical condition, and a legal status. Something similar is at work with necrophilia. In classifications, laws, necro-porn sites, novels, and tv shows, you can literally witness the invention of a sexual perversion. In the near future, there may well be such a sophisticated notion of necrophilia that everything before will have been just sex with corpses.
Perhaps not varying levels of intensity but varying levels of sexualization (made up word?) or attraction to a body that is, SPECIFICALLY, dead.
The roleplaying couple may not necessarily be attracted to dead bodies, either of them. Perhaps what they are aroused by is the idea of one of them being unconscious. A necrophilia site I was one had a special section for people who were aroused by having sex with someone that was asleep, unconscious or in some state of unawareness, of which death would be perhaps the ultimate and most hardcore “level” to be at. I have to think in this situation they may be more into the kink of it rather than any actual necrophilia aspects, but I could be wrong.
Romantic necrophiles are of the type that should be touched upon more in fiction and art.
The other categories seem to be one in the same. A necrophile with little to no access to bodies may eventually kill someone. Someone with an interest in mutilation may take to dead bodies because it’s easier than having to deal with a live person, potentially the same with the opportunistic necrophile and the fetishistic necrophile (hey, a foot is a foot, alive or not).
Fascinating stuff.
if a person can legally donate their body science, couldn’t it in theory be that a person could also donate their body for sexual use after death to a brothel like a patron could come in and choose from the freezer a bevy of beauties who have died in various ways.
it would be legal because the lady or man involved had a wish to provide sexual release to those in need plus in could bring in money to the family of the deceased….sort of like reverse prostitution… an insurance policy that ensured an on going income to your family, especially since the cost of funerals is so high these days.
then there would be no more need for sex hungry necro’s to go out grave robbing…..
the brothel would take a percentage of the fee’s earned, to cover costs such as embalming, and storage plus profit whats left over perhaps, 45% would be straight out money for their families…
we could end up seeing necro brothels popping up every where…. the slogan could be “why don’t you’ll come on in and see whats on the slab”…
Necrophilia For Beginners: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Catholic Church’s point-of-view on necrophilia?
There’s a little bit in the New Testament about “rising from the grave”. Look it up and imagine it’s being written by someone winking and smiling and I think you’ll have your answer. Just don’t use a condom or you’re going to hell.
Is there a danger of sexually-transmitted disease?
Absolutely not. When the body dies all form of diseases in the body die too. Instantly! Why, you could pump a bloated AIDS victim till his or her legs fell off and startled the dog and you’d be perfectly safe!
However, do remember that once a body has been in the ground for a while it can become home to moles. Despite being blind they have sharp claws and pointy teeth and have been known to tackle mountain lions when riled. Always prod your corpse partner with a coathanger thoroughly prior to any act of love.
What’s the best place to find dead bodies?
Where you left them. Haha, that’s a joke! But, seriously, the answer may seem obvious to many but for some it can be a tricky problem. Cemetaries contain a whole host of not-unwilling sex partners but digging them up takes a lot of effort. Not only that but you could end up playing a form of lottery; will this body have decayed beyond practical use? Will I open this coffin and find David Blaine trying to beat another boring record?
The real answer can vary from place to place. If you have any mob connections or a local syndicate near you then an arrangement could be made. Alternatively – and especially if maturity isn’t an issue – alternate nights spent dressing up as the grim reaper and an ambulance driver and visiting old people’s homes can reap huge dividends.
Is it true you can just add water to cremated remains and rehydrate a dead body?
Yes it is. But you must remember that both the body and the coffin are incinerated (except in respected crematoria where they remove the body and reuse the casket as part of a con trick). Subsequently, you should prepare yourself for excessively wooden partners after hydration is complete and increased splinter risk. On the plus side you might get lucky and find a good knot in a great place.
Will there be a problem with the smell?
Dead people lose all their senses – including smell – so they won’t mind one bit. Haha, that’s another joke! You can have that one. But if you have access to embalming fluid you might want to start sniffing it daily now.
I’m a woman. What are my necrophiliac options?
God, being a misogynist if the Bible is taken at its word, seems to have made it relatively simple for men to participate in necrophilia with just about anyone, at any time, anywhere, and in any condition. Hell, a skull will do the trick. For heterosexual ladies it’s a little more tricky.
Rigor mortis is a wonderful thing with often hilarious results for morticians and crime scene investigators to laugh about but it only occurs at a relatively set time after death – allowing for normal temperature conditions – and, once the decaying process begins, lysosomal intracellular digestive enzymes begin to leak into the body and relax the tensed muscles. In laymans terms: hello Mr Floppy.
Taxidermy is the solution. You will probably find classes at a college near you. With the skills you learn you might also find that one special person who you want to share the rest of your life with and stuff the entire body rather than just the important six inches. And you could even start your own harem. So, it’s not all bad for the girls.
What about zombies?
Sleeping with a dead person is a large step to take so many people take a trip to Haiti first and employ the services of a Voodoo priest to conjure up a zombie. The odour, lack of complaining, and pressure-free no-commitment sex are all there and that can help to make the minds up of ditherers. However, a zombie will shuffle and moan and try to eat your brain unless you tie it down. Personally, I find this a distraction but if you are in two minds about necrophilia then booking a zombie sex vacation at your travel agent’s may be exactly what you need.
Enjoyability · Even complete novices sometimes get it right and have fun but with necrophiliac sex there is a cast-iron guarantee that 50% of the couple are receiving no pleasure whatsoever!
Abortions · Scientific tests show that conception rates among the deceased are at an all-time low. That’s not an evolutionary process though; that’s the work of God!
Ungodly Thoughts · Once you start regularly climaxing with a corpse you’ll discover that far from thinking in an ungodly manner your actual rate of Godly thoughts will go through the roof. Thoughts like: “Oh God, what the hell am I doing?”, “Dear God, I’ve got coffin splinters in my arse”, and “Oh sweet baby Jesus I didn’t think that would snap off and get lodged in there”.
http://www.neonbubble.com/article/necrophilia-for-beginners
Furpo; Thanks for a couple of the best posts of all time :)
Now; Who Isn’t a ” Class VII — Opportunistic ” ? Come on ….. Admit it! :D
thanks furpo i didn’t know there was a necrocard thanks for the heads up, think i’ll get myself one.
I can already see the Facebook quiz: What class of necrophile are you?
I just wanted to note to anyone who’s not yet read your book (Necrophilia Variations), that it’s really a fun read. Not even in the least morbid or depressing. In fact, it’s creative, engrossing and –at times — downright romantic. I highly recommend it.
And me? I need my sex partner to be at least room temperature.
xo
Definately class 1 for me…”having sex with a living person pretending to be dead.”
How many times has that happened?

View the original article here

Luckless Predator Only Attracted to Undercover Cops

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

“It’s official. There’s nobody in the chat rooms but pedophiles and undercover police. On Thursday, a federal appeals court upheld the conviction of an Indiana man whose online efforts to proposition underage girls led him to not one, not two, but three undercover cops, none of whom apparently knew about the others. The case began in August 2006, when aspiring sexual predator James Daniel started an online conversation with Amanda_13, a fake 13-year-old girl voiced by Sergeant Richard Howard of the Porter County Sheriff’s Department. After several highly explicit chats, Daniel asked Amanda_13 to meet him at a park in Valparaiso, Indiana, to have sex. When he showed up, he was arrested for inducing an individual under 18 to engage in criminal sexual activity. When Secret Service agents searched Daniel’s computer, they found logs of chats with two other apparent minors, who described themselves as 13 and 15 years old, respectively. Federal prosecutors introduced the chats at Daniel’s trial as evidence of his perverted motives. Supposedly, it was only after Daniel was convicted that the feds realized that one of those girls, daisy13_Indiana, was also a cop working the very same Secret Service operation. They informed Daniel’s attorney, who appealed on the grounds that the government improperly withheld information that would have proven entrapment. The case became even more bizarre when the three-judge appellate panel reviewing the conviction saw the screen name of the third supposed teenager, blonddt, and recognized it from an earlier case… Daniel is serving a sentence of 17-and-a-half years in prison, followed by supervised release for life. There’s no evidence in the record that he ever succeeded in talking with a real underage girl.” — Wired (U.S.)

(Thanks to Furpo and “Yahweh Ben Yahweh Sheikh Hassan Al-Nasri” for the link.)

Clearly there are still plenty of men who believe that chat rooms are breeding grounds for hot, bored adolescents anxious to lose their sexual innocence in the arms of older, experienced men. Of course, “older” and “experienced” too often means meaty, middle-aged, married, and quite possibly mindless. There has been a ton of media attention paid to OMFG! ONLINE PREDATORS!. How is it that these Humbert Humberts have not yet figured out that the only visitors to chat rooms are cops, cyber-vigilantes, and other pedophiles? Does their lust compromise their judgement? (Yes.) Are they just plain dumb? (Maybe.) Impulsive? (Probably.)

It is difficult to figure. But then PervScan and its readership are clearly attuned to the latest developments in the world of kink. (Desensitized? Yes. Clueless? No.) Maybe some of these men who get caught with their hands in the candy jar don’t have the informational sophistication to understand the perils of trolling for teens online. They may come from repressive environments… Sexuality is not spoken about… “Deviant” is a word they learn from the condemnation of homosexuals in a Bible study group… Meanwhile they struggle with irrepressible urges… One day they can no longer resist. Rather than test the waters (go slowly, dip in a foot, stay near the bank), they leap directly into the center of the pond. “Here I go. Banzai!”

It must come as quite a shock to be handcuffed in the back seat of a police cruiser. Perhaps one day a clever perv will demonstrate that pedophiles are not so mindless. “I was not trying to molest a child,” he will argue in his defense. “I was only satisfying my fetish for roleplaying cops. After all, if I were a pedophile, I certainly would not be hanging out in a chat room. Everybody knows that these chat rooms are inhabited not by little girls but by detectives who pretend to be little girls.”

You can almost imagine that the very word “pedophilia” will mutate in meaning. Instead of “sexual feelings directed toward children,” it will come to signify “sexual feelings toward police offers with adult baby syndrome.”

this just shows there is a fetish for everything and everyone….

I have a fetish for this site, Scottish men, and comb handles.

i have a fetish for young men dressed as police officers, it’s that whole hand cuffs hanging off a leather belt mixed with dominant authority, plus they are expected to be role models but you just know that they are just bad, bad boys underneath that tight blue uniform….as long as they are in shape, good looking and about 24 i will look all i want….

View the original article here

Flip the Sexual Orientation Switch

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

There is an astonishing article in the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurology. Its title is “Altered Sexual Orientation Following Dominant Hemisphere Infarct.” (An infarct is dead tissue caused by a lack of blood supply.) The article gives the case history of a happily homosexual man who, after this “cerebral accident,” underwent a complete reversal in sexual orientation.

The patient, a 57-year-old right-handed man, sustained his first cerebral vascular accident in the right middle cerebral artery region at the age of 45, which resulted in right-sided hemiparesis that resolved completely within 3 months… [After his recovery, he was fine] until he sustained the second cerebral vascular accident in the left middle cerebral artery region at age 53.

The patient started complaining of his changed personality and heterosexual orientation 6 months after his second stroke. At the same time he complained of excessive mood swings and changed interests… His sexual orientation remained heterosexual 4 years following the second stroke, and he preferred to describe himself as bisexual because of his previous homosexual orientation.

Our patient was aware of his homosexual orientation beginning in his early teens. He always enjoyed his gay relationships and had had at some point a live-in partner… It is unlikely that his psychological reaction to his first and/or second stroke could explain his altered sexual orientation, and his sexuality was accepted by his social network and family members.

Taking into consideration the interval between his first and second stroke, it is likely that an organic process within the left middle cerebral artery region is the cause of his altered sexual orientation.

While there is a great deal of debate about whether it is nature and/or nurture that determines sexual orientation, the one thing you never quite imagine is that gender preferences can be flipped on or off like a light switch. When a gay person comes out, it generally appears to be a matter of learning to accept the social consequences of a pre-existing orientation. This is reinforced by the fact that gays — and straights — often know their orientation at a very young age. It seems hard-wired.

But what if sexual orientation is as simple as that — a switch in the brain? How would you feel to know that a good bop in the head might cause you to wake up the next day with a desire for something you never desired before? And what if it weren’t just a matter of gay or straight but of a variety of sexual types? For example, it is known that various types of head injury can result in hypersexuality. What if you were to have a stroke and suddenly find yourself with an irresistible fetish for feet or puppies? Is it possible that perverts are not sexually liberated (as they like to think) or mentally ill (as some like to think) but rather victims of cerebral events? What if perversion is nothing more than a symptom in the same class as slurred speech or blurry vision?

Of course, if it turns out that sexual orientation is a switch, there will be those who want to flip others’ switches — puritans who want to straighten the queer, or maybe militant queers who want to undermine the straight. On the bright side, there will also arise a class of people who flip their switch back and forth just for kicks. “Now what sexual orientation matches my shoes tonight? Hmmm…” Gender hackers… Sexual proclivity tinkerers… Pansexual dilettantes… Is it possible that the future of fun lies in the hands of neuroscientists?

Well, that’s a relief. All this time thought I was mental and it’s just that fall off the ladder when I was a kid.

Sounds a bit like ” Total Recall ” with sexuality involved.

So sexual orientation can be changed by the death of certain regions of the brain. Hmm…this gives a whole new meaning to the term “brain-dead.”

I’d volunteer for a clinical trial.

View the original article here

Man Pays Teens to Spit in His Face

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

“A 39-year-old Southern California man has been arrested for misdemeanor child annoyance after allegedly paying a teenager $31 to spit in his face. The Ventura County Sheriff’s Department says Charles Hersel was arrested Wednesday in a sting operation at a mall in Thousand Oaks. He’s free from jail pending a court hearing. A sheriff’s statement says Westlake High School students claimed Hersel paid them to yell profanities, spit and slap him in the face. Several also claimed he offered them cash to urinate and defecate on him. A motive wasn’t clear. Authorities say Hersel contacted some teens through the MySpace social networking site. Hersel couldn’t be reached for comment Friday. He had no listed phone number in Thousand Oaks.” — San Francisco Chronicle (U.S.)

Here is a photograph of Mr Hersel. He has brown eyes, a small mouth, large cheeks, and ears that look like they’ve been surgically stapled to the sides of his head. The news reports make no mention of his profession, but his appearance suggests a line of work ranging from sports agent to car salesman. Of course, appearances can be deceptive. His colleagues, whoever they are, probably had no idea he liked to be humiliated by the Westlake Warriors. According to another report, “It didn’t take long for word to spread among local teens that they could get paid to spit in a man’s face.” Easy money.

Unlike the “saliva fetish” pervert — a guy who would obtain spittle from young girls under false pretenses and then masturbate with it — Mr Hersel apparently sought from teen boys what many men seek from sadists, masters, and dominatrixes. What he wanted to do was not uncommon, nor who he wanted to do it. Thus far there have been no reports that he sought out boys younger than 16 or so. A law blog expresses skepticism about the worth of even arresting the guy: “After years of practicing criminal law, most lawyers will never see a charge of ‘child annoyance’ being prosecuted. The question for many is whether with California’s budget crisis, this is a crime truly worth prosecuting and spending precious local resources on.”

It would be interesting to calculate how much money is spent every year on the criminalization of sexual behaviors. In America, there has doubtless been a drastic decrease in the amount spent on the criminalization of homosexuality. Conversely, there has been an exponential increase in the amount spent on pedophilia. Probably that is quite rational, since a child has less ability to engage in a consensual relationship with an adult than an adult has to engage with another person of the same gender. But how much is a society willing to pony up to rid itself of any given form of deviance? Is a billion dollars too much or too little to combat perversion x? Or what if the question was posed on a very direct, individual level… How much tax would you be willing to pay to combat, say, pedophilia? Ten dollars a year? A hundred? A thousand? More? Or to the contrary, would you pay to promote rather than suppress it?

??? Weird as all that is, what actually catches my eye is the Thirty ONE $! How come thirty one? I take it ye have 10$ bills? So, he pulled off three of those and then stuck his hand in his pocket for a 1$? Weird!

Oh my. I wonder if this is “Westlake Warriors” specific–there is the off chance that he’s a former football player for one of Westlake’s rivals, still working out some old losing-streak issues? Looks as if he might still be on that streak…. I would be fascinated to see survey results on what taxpayers are willing to spend in this regard–it would come down to “pet peeves,” I suppose, but I’d be interested in seeing what regional variation there is. Could be quite telling.

“??? Weird as all that is, what actually catches my eye is the Thirty ONE $! How come thirty one? I take it ye have 10$ bills? So, he pulled off three of those and then stuck his hand in his pocket for a 1$? Weird!”

Well, maybe the number 31 had some kind of symbolism, significance, or meaning to him. I myself attach meanings to some numbers. Also he probably figured to pay them 31 dollars as he thought spitting in someone’s face wasn’t the hardest thing in the world to do, and there were things he valued more than being spat upon, and these were teenagers. He probably didn’t think they would have gone further than 31 dollars and he probably was old fashioned and didn’t know teens these days have devices like I-Pods and I-Pod Minis. Who knows the mentality of this weirdo?

This is a strange story. However, as an attorney I can tell you that this incident does not meet the requirements for a child annoyance conviction. As such, I believe that a fine, some probation and counseling are in order for this young man. The law is the law. The motive here, if there even was any,can not be considered sexual as there is no evidence for that in the details that the media have documented. This is frankly a waste of tax payer dollars, in Ventura County people are just struggling to survive and feed their families. The cops have real criminals to catch and they wasted their time on this guy. Anyway, such is the criminal justice system in California.:(

View the original article here

Getting Back in the Saddle with Bestiality

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

PervScan apologizes for the lack of updates over the last 6 weeks. One person even wrote to ask if Supervert had been caught in flagrante delicto and sent to jail. No, no, Supervert has not been doing time. If anything, it’s time that’s been doing Supervert — bending us over, so to speak, and letting us know who is the bottom in the relationship between time and the individual. Time is a harsh mistress, indeed… At any rate, PervScan is not dead, and many thanks to those of you who have suffered along with it. What better way to get back in the saddle than with a bestiality roundup?

First, Margaret sent in the sordid tale of a South Carolina man caught for having sex with a horse. Incredibly, he’d already been apprehended once before with the exact same animal.

[The owner] noticed several weeks ago her 21-year-old horse Sugar was acting strange and getting infections again… “Police kept telling me it couldn’t be the same guy [but] I couldn’t believe that there were two guys going around doing this to the same horse…” [The owner] installed surveillance cameras, and when she reviewed the footage from July 19, she couldn’t believe she was seeing the same man doing the same thing to her horse… [The owner] staked out the barn and caught Vereen inside Monday night, chasing him to his truck and holding him with her shotgun until police came.

You would imagine that the pain and humiliation of being arrested the first time would have prevented a second occurrence. Or you would expect the bestialist, if he really couldn’t prevent himself from dallying with animals, to pursue a different creature in a different place. The fact that he risked so much in returning to the same horse makes you wonder if his perversion went far beyond physical pleasure. Perhaps he really loved the thing?

Second, another story in the news concerns a young man arresting “for having sex with a whippet mix named Silvy.” When police arrived, “they found the dog’s legs were duct-taped closed with a cloth pressed against her lower half.” Later the animal had to be euthanized. “A necropsy was conducted on the animal and veterinarians discovered human, male DNA inside the dog’s body.” The perp declared he had been abusing the dog because “he was lonely” — an example which was probably as true as it was bathetic.

For the most part, the sad saga of this dog fucker is mundane enough. It only differs from a thousand other stories in those little details about the cloth and the duct tape. What was the cloth for? To keep the dog from shitting or pissing on him? (Hate when that happens. There you are ready to bone a dog and the thing shits on your crotch…) And while you can imagine why the duct tape was useful, in that it kept the dog from running away, it also serves as a rather disturbing detail. Didn’t it make the dog resemble the lame or the physically disabled? Maybe that was his real thing — crippled creatures…

 

Good to see ye back, Supervert :-)

I think the above to tales are honestly about as clear an example as one could hope for of the distinction between a ” Bestialist ” (Or, in this case, a sick fuck who I’d happily, personally put one behind the ear of) and a ” Zoophile “.

Boy, Supervert. I can almost hear your yawn reading through that one. Thanks for the continued desensitization toward all things marginal (a common theme of yours). Welcome back, all the same.

It’s good to have ya back Supervert! I still liked looking at the articles from the days past but I’m definitely glad to get new stuff. There is just no end to people’s sexual preferences and behaviors! Keep up the good work!

A hiatus is as good as a rest? Wait: a hiatus is a rest (unless it is a hernia). Anyway, I hope someone saw fit to ask that Vereen chap what his game was. My hunch is it was just the path of least resistance–he knew the situation, knew the horse, and couldn’t be bothered to get more creative/adventurous. Then again, who knows. People and horses. It can get weird, clearly. One time in the UK a (posh) woman came up to me on my leopard appy, patted him and said (to him), “You’re a lovely person, aren’t you?” Ignored me–the person in the situation. Fine…

Yay! Welcome back!!

Poor dog, so he did’nt just have sex with it, which is bad enough although it seems common these days.. He actually tied it up and then raped it to death!.

Sick fuck! The dog would have been in agony and would have yelped and stuff so he would have known he was hurting it. But oh wait a minute.. he was lonely….

Idiot, could have gone to a bar and picked up a fat slag for the cost of a few drinks! Hope he gets a jail sentance in a federal jail! They’ll make him bleed from his ass good :O)

Ah, I guess when you love someone, it is mandatory to duct their legs…

Oh, yeah, that’s what you call:
Rape – Force (someone) to have sex against their will.

But, ’sex’ is purely (rape or not):
Sex – The act of sexual procreation between a male and a female/male; the man’s penis is inserted into the female’s vagina / male/female’s anus and excited until orgasm and ejaculation occur.

And ‘love’ is simply:
A deep feeling of romantic/social/sexual affection, devotion, desire, security and/or attraction/affinity.

I don’t see where ’sex’ or ‘love’ defines ‘duct-taping someone’s legs’.

But ‘duct-raping’ implies ‘rape’s meaning, because it is ‘force’, simple as.

Bestialists include these forms of zoosexual:
* Fence-Hopper (trespasser/whore/pervert).
* Brutal Rapist (Zoosadist).
* Rapist (Zooerastes) (pedo-bestiality comes under here, too).
* Briber (usually a sign of rape, with desperation from victim to some element (food (like peanut butter), smells, etc) (not all too serious, especially compared to human-human relationships, but this kind of activity may be classed mildly as bestialist, and is actually, extremely common with those whom masturbate regularly with their animals).
* Killer (the worse kind of bestialist, completely zoosadist; whether they have sex before, during and/or after killing the animal (necrophilia/zoosadism)).

That guy, desperate or not, who ‘raped’ Silvy, should be jailed for the protection of the dog, and potentially other future ones. A jail sentence may let his hormones clear, and most certainly will prevent, at least, psychologically ‘him’ doing it again,

The horse guy was just a fence-hopper and bestialist, end of.

Regards,
James

When I was 14, I penetrated myself anally with a comb handle. I am now 25, and I still have the comb. I am going to gold plate it and sell it on ebay.

hey supervert great to have you back baby….
and i’m more angered at the abuse and suffering caused by the dog rapist then by the horse lover, horses are very large robust animals,while it still might freak the horse out to have some weird guy sodomizing her in the middle of the night, he didn’t cause her so much internal damage that she had to be put down.
i mean it’s just cruel to duct tape a smallish dog then have sexy time with it, hearing it yelping in pain and then refusing to pay for the vet care….now that is a sick f*ck who needs mental help fast…

how much will your starting bid be chris…i can just bet that there are plenty of gay men out there who would love to give that comb a new home….

Starting bid will be £20 (uk). I am straight, but yes, I am expecting gay men to be bidding.

Have fun selling, Chris.

Kangaroos for a “hopping good” time!

Omg what a sicko! O-o That poor animal… :(

All comments become the property of PervScan. You must use an email address to post a comment. However, PervScan disallows email addresses in the text of comments.

Stimulation

PervScan is not a porn site, but the pervy content leads people to look for it here. So if you want porn, this is good porn — stuff PervScan has viewed itself and feels good about recommending to you.

View the original article here

Pictures Prompt Charge Of Abuse Of Corpse

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

“A funeral director at Earthman Funeral Home has been charged with abuse of a corpse after investigators found digital photos dating back five years of the director posing with his penis touching the feet of a nude female cadaver. According to court documents, James Howard Patton, 38, is free on a $1,500 bond after being charged with a class A misdemeanor. An investigator with the Houston Police Department was looking into allegations of Internet harassment lodged against Patton by his ex-girlfriend when an April 2 search warrant turned up several photos on Patton’s computer. It was unclear from court documents whether there was more than one corpse and one incident. Lisa Marshall, a spokeswoman for Earthman’s parent company, Service Corporation International, said the photos recovered from Patton’s computer were taken in 2004… ‘These are very disturbing allegations,’ Marshall said. ‘I hope people understand that this incident is unusual and is not indicative of what we’re like as an industry.’” — Chron (US)

(Thanks to Asmo and to Furpo for links.)

Several commenters on an article about Mr Patton at the Houston Press claim to have found him “creepy” when working with him. “This guy is the creepiest dude ever. He handled my mother’s funeral and if they find pics of her he won’t have to worry about the law.” Here is a picture of the perp himself. There is something lopsided about his face. One ear sticks out. His lips droop to the side. His nose looks like it was broken. As if to reaffirm the lack of symmetry, the police photo casts a sharp light on one side of his face and leaves the other in shadow. Perhaps all this symbolizes Mr Patton’s dual nature. Clearly he is a man with a dark side.

He posed with his penis against the feet of a female cadaver. According to another article, he also took images “of a female corpse with the legs spread open.” The local District Attorney stated that “the defendant’s male sexual organ was seen in various poses with those of dead bodies.” The wording isn’t clear. The images show his genitalia with “those of dead bodies,” ie in proximity to the genitalia of cadavers? Or just in proximity to the cadavers? Of course, you can’t help but wonder if all this posing led to the next logical step in the abuse of a corpse…

When you consider that these necro photos were found on Mr Patton’s computer during the investigation of an unrelated matter, you realize that there must literally be millions of such photos and videos lurking out there on the hard drives of random deviants and freaks. Just imagine the astonishing exhibition you could curate, presuming you and your photographers weren’t bound by obscenity laws, of every perversion known to man. The internet, with its proliferating pornography and true underground of sites catering to illegal activities, already forms a rough draft of this exhibit. What do you think the gallery would look like if it were completed with the pictures that no one but the freaks and the law ever see?

Somedays, I’m temped to go into law enforcement *just* to see those motherfuckin’ creepy photos. For real.

But I gotta say, WTF guys? I spent three years in the funeral business, and I never ever knew of anyone ever taking any sort of photo of the dead (except that one time when the autopsy was all fucked up during my friend’s residency), and I’m pretty sure no one ever took their genitals out at the funeral home.

When we were studying A&P, my teacher skipped right over the reproductive system, because he always said ‘There is no sex in the prep room’.

On the other hand, I’m not a fan of SCI, so I kind of like when things go wrong for them. Boo funeral corporations and huge conglomerates! Yay, small family owned businesses.

“What do you think the gallery would look like if it were completed with the pictures that no one but the freaks and the law ever see?”
How about Tsutomu Miyazaki, a Japanese serial killer also known as The Otaku Murderer, The Little Girl Murderer, and Dracula.
Between 1988 and 1989, Miyazaki mutilated and killed four girls, ages four to seven; he then sexually molested their corpses.
Maintained a collection of 5,763 videotapes, some containing anime and slasher films. Interspersed among them was video footage and pictures of his victims. Check him out on wikipida

View the original article here

Arsonist with a Manure Fetish

PervScan is for adults only. If you are under 18, you must leave now.

“A pervert got thrills from covering himself in farmyard manure and performing sex acts, a court heard yesterday. Weirdo David Truscott loved pleasuring himself while wallowing in muck. And he terrorised a farmer’s family with another bizarre fetish for setting fire to things including outbuildings and machinery, causing thousands of pounds’ damage. Truscott targeted Clive Roth’s farm for seven months before he was caught in a police surveillance operation. Cops nabbed him prowling round the property near Red-ruth, Cornwall, at 1am in shiny red shorts and latex gloves. Truro magistrates heard jobless Truscott, 35, who owned 360 pairs of knickers and slept in ladies’ pyjamas, admitted he got a kick out of manure. Once he stripped to his pants and climbed inside a muckspreader to fondle himself. Another time he rolled around in dung while trying to set Mr Roth’s tractor ablaze. Prosecutor Simon Jones said his antics increasingly frightened the Roth family, especially when one fire he started caused the death of a cow. Truscott, from Redruth, admitted three charges of arson and one of burglary. He will be sentenced at Truro Crown Court next month.” — The Sun (UK)

It is not always easy to make out the line between perversion and insanity. Suppose this guy didn’t jerk off while rolling about in manure and setting fire to farm equipment. You might think he was mentally ill. You would expect him to be put on a regimen of antipsychotics while a battery of therapists ask him questions such as, “Why do you hate yourself? Because of your mommy?” But once masturbation figures into it, the picture seems to change. The guy’s not a lunatic. He’s a pervert. He doesn’t suffer from deranged ideas. He harbors disgusting fetishes. He doesn’t need antipsychotics. He needs “harsh medicine,” punishment, prison. It’s as though the sexualization of an essentially insane activity puts the guy into an entirely different category of existence.

Havelock Ellis, in his classic Studies in the Psychology of Sex, discusses this wavering line between insanity and perversion, particularly with regard to coprophagia (the eating of fecal matter):

Coprophagic acts, whether under the influences of religious exaltation or of sexual rapture, inevitably excite our disgust. We regard them as almost insane, fortified in that belief by the undoubted fact that coprophagia is not uncommon among the insane. It may, therefore, be proper to point out that it is not so very long since the ingestion of human excrement was carried out by our own forefathers in the most sane and deliberate manner.

Ellis goes on to give examples of “normal” coprophagia. Nowadays these examples could be supplemented with other forms of scatology — urine therapy, for example, or the intentionally polemical argument that “Americans should ingest more excrement” as a way of building up resistances that we have lost owing to an oversanitized culture. It all makes you wonder how an individual who eats or, as the case may be, pleasures himself with excrement ends up being defined. Why is it perverse to jerk off in a manure spreader when it is sometimes mad and other times normal to interact with excrement? Ellis indicates that, in his view, it is a matter of degree:

the impulse to bestow a symbolic value on the act of urination in a beloved person, is not extremely uncommon; it has been noted of men of high intellectual distinction; it occurs in women as well as men; when existing in only a slight degree, it must be regarded as within the normal limits of variation of sexual emotion.

Perhaps Ellis would have thought the arsonist with a manure fetish crossed the line — the guy sought feces, not urine; the excrement came not from a “beloved person” but from farm animals; and then there’s the matter of burning an animal to death… Perhaps the pervert was trying to “bestow a symbolic value” on the act, suggesting that, in matters of sexuality, we should rid ourselves of our sacred cows?

I think this says more about our attitudes to sex than his pervesion. Though I think the acts of arson would suggest insanity rather than pervesion

Holy shit, he should get a job with a septic tank disposal service.

“after a hard days work he thought he would stop by Clive Roth’s farm and pleasure himself in the manure spreader and then set a few things on
fire”…what degree does Ellis say this is?

i like to roll around in 10 gallon drums of fail sauce, then cum all over my fathers plants

Hey! nothing like standing with one leg on a chair, a plate under on the floor and hearing your delicious shit ploppng onto the plate..
Holding that plate of warm shit and with a fork gently feeding yurself that heavy mound..My cock is
rock hard when I take some to rub all over it..

The taste is strong – but sooooo delicious!
My dad would love to feed me his warm shit as a kid – been hooked ever since!

How amusing will that be when he finally kills himself, setting fire to a fertilizer silo or gets some form of infection due to rolling around in shit?

‘Dear God, what is that horrid smell?!?’

‘Oh, that’s just this cadaver, Doctor. Autoerotic misadventure. This one happened to be a shitlicker.’

View the original article here